Manjrekar said it was a “poor technology offering” and that the TV umpire should not have asked the on-field umpire to overturn the decision if it was inconclusive.
“Firstly, disappointed with what was provided to the TV umpire,” Manjrekar said in sports star. “He should have gotten more evidence. Based on just a few angles, I don’t think such an important decision in the match should have been made. The point is, to the naked eye, there is only one certainty: the cushion is being hit by the bat. It’s the only visual certainty we have that, for everything else, the help of technology was needed, which is Snicko.
“So ideally, if there was a bat, like an edge to the ball, there should have been a previous hit because clearly there were two events there, and the umpire obviously heard a noise. The visual certainty was the bat hitting the pad. If that was the peak, then there was no external advantage. If we were shown two peaks, then you could say the first one was the bat. So it was an insufficient supply of technology to the TV referee, and he should have said he can’t. . hit it.”
Manjrekar also termed the moment a “farce” considering India’s position in the match.
“If there weren’t two spikes, they should have followed the visual evidence of the bat hitting the pad. I think it was bad on all counts and I don’t blame the umpire on the field. You have to feel for KL Rahul, the amount of work tough that was done in the opening innings and a great moment personally for him when you look at his career and for India as well.
“The referees are looking for conclusive evidence. There were some gremlins at the beginning of that review, the first test being where he didn’t get some camera angles he was asking for,” Taufel said on Channel Seven transmission. “Richard Illingworth had a tough job there, but this camera angle is probably the best for me, it shows that the ball brushes the outside edge. In my opinion, the ball brushes the outside edge, which caused the scuff marks, but then the bat hits the pad. So I think from the batsman’s point of view, they are looking to see that evidence on the big screen as the decision is made. I think that’s exactly why KL Rahul has a question mark in his mind and. . Ricardo Kettleborough too. I imagine there will be an interesting discussion in the referees’ room at lunch break.”
Source link
